LA home
Legacy Allocation

Tactical rotational allocation model rules-based between QQQ, SLV and CASH.

Universe: QQQ / SLV / CASH Signal at close → execution at open Objective: drawdown control

Quantitative tactical allocation model designed to participate in trends when the regime is favorable and reduce exposure in a disciplined way when risk increases. Clear rules, simple operation and traceability for professional evaluation.

Rotational system (high level)
Systematic rotation · no discretion
Why SLV and QQQ fit so well

Two different engines for the same goal: grow and protect.

Silver and tech stocks tend to move for different reasons. That difference is precisely what makes a rotation strategy powerful.

QQQ tends to lead when there is confidence, liquidity and appetite for growth.
SLV often shines in moments of uncertainty, inflation or market stress… and also has an industrial component that gives it a life of its own.
Together they bring something key: alternating opportunities. When one engine cools, the other sometimes takes over.

Card 1

QQQ: the growth engine

Captures “risk-on” market stretches: innovation, technology, expansion.

Card 2

SLV: the diversifier with character

Can act as a “real asset” and also responds to industrial cycles. Brings different behavior from equities.

Card 3

CASH: the smart brake

When the environment gets complicated, cash doesn’t try to win: it tries to avoid the blow and keep you standing for the next stretch.

Visual evidence of system behavior vs benchmarks: equity evolution and stress in severe drawdowns.

Equity

Strategy vs benchmarks

Comparative of compound growth and equity stability across different regimes.

How to read it

The question is not whether an asset can rise more in certain years. The question is what happens when the market enters destructive phases.

Evolución de equity: estrategia vs benchmarks
Equity curve: Strategy vs QQQ (B&H) vs SLV (B&H)
Risk

Top 5 drawdowns (stress)

Most severe episodes ordered chronologically for “committee” reading.

Interpretation

Does not eliminate risk, but avoids destructive capital events, improving the stability and investability of the system.

Top 5 drawdowns: estrategia y benchmarks (committee format)
Top drawdowns: Strategy vs benchmarks (chronological)
Why it matters

Process first. Evidence after.

Evaluable framework in committee: auditable rules, explicit assumptions and defensible operation.

Rotation between ETFs

Rotational allocation by regime: QQQ / SLV / CASH.

🛡️

Risk “drawdown-first”

Design oriented to capital survival under stress.

⚙️

Operational viability

Low friction: clear rules, contained rotation, realistic execution.

🔎

Traceability

Documentation and reporting designed for due diligence.

Professional access

Material for institutional evaluation.

Universe
Liquid ETFs: QQQ, SLV, CASH
Execution
Signal at close → execution at open
Governance
Explicit rules · versioned changes
Reporting
Historical series, benchmarks, stress, exposure
What access includes

Full reporting, annexes, execution assumptions and methodological notes for evaluation (committee / due diligence).

If you need verified access to the professional dashboard, request it below.

Professional Dashboard

Request verified access to the dashboard and reporting pack for committee (annexes, assumptions and methodological notes).

Testimonials and references

What they say about Legacy Allocation

Comments and ratings on the clarity of the model, its operational discipline and its fit within a professional evaluation framework.

0
0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)
Excellent
Very good
Average
Poor
Terrible

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.

Información importante

Legacy Allocation es una herramienta de análisis cuantitativo con carácter informativo y educativo.

  • No constituye recomendación personalizada ni oferta/solicitud de compra o venta de instrumentos financieros.
  • No presta asesoramiento financiero y no es una entidad registrada ni supervisada por la CNMV.
  • Simulador: resultados basados en histórico/simulación. Serie estática actualizada hasta el 10 de febrero de 2025.
  • El usuario es responsable del uso de esta información y de sus decisiones.
Scroll to Top